nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Immersive Learning Design in the Metaverse: A Theoretical Literature Review Synthesis

verfasst von : Stylianos Mystakidis, Vangelis Lympouridis

Erschienen in: Application of the Metaverse in Education

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Metaverse-enabled experiences can have a profound, transformational impact on educational practice. Significant innovations related to the adoption of this new manifestation of the internet and its capabilities are expected in all levels of education. In higher education, several universities are building digital twins of campuses as the first step of embracing technology and understanding what is possible. But how should we design and organize education in the Metaverse? Reproducing existing practices should be carefully examined to avoid the pitfall of the routinization. New instructional design models and frameworks are needed to guide educational practices toward smart and experiential immersive education. Engaging, durable learning that shapes and transforms the competences and identity of students is a hallmark of high-quality education. This review presents three strategic approaches for effective immersive learning design in the Metaverse. It also analyzes instructional frameworks, models, and taxonomies with the support of XR technologies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Education in the Metaverse

Nächstes Kapitel A Roadmap Toward Metaversity: Recent Developments and Perspectives in Education

Abdullah, J., Mohd-Isa, W. N., & Samsudin, M. A. (2019). Virtual reality to improve group work skill and self-directed learning in problem-based learning narratives. Virtual Real, 23(4), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00381-1CrossRef

Albion, P. (2015). Project-, problem-, and inquiry-based learning. In M. Henderson (Ed.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions (pp. 240–252). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

AlDahdouh, A., Osório, A., Caires, S. (2015). Understanding knowledge network, learning and connectivism. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(10)

Armellini, A., & Padilla Rodriguez, B. C. (2021). Active blended learning. In B. C. P. Rodriguez & A. Armellini (Eds.), Cases on active blended learning in higher education (pp. 1–22). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7856-8.ch001

Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on demand: what virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do. W. W. Norton.

Beck, D., Morgado, L., & O’Shea, P. (2023). Educational practices and strategies with immersive learning environments: mapping of reviews for using the metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3243946

Berge, Z. L. (2002). Active, interactive, and reflective elearning. Q Rev Distance Educ, 3(2), 181. [Online]. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/95272

Bourguet, M.-L., Wang, X., Ran, Y., Zhou, Z., Zhang, Y., & Romero-Gonzalez, M. (2020). Virtual and augmented reality for teaching materials science: a students as partners and as producers project. In IEEE TALE 2020

Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58(1), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2011.08.024CrossRef

Calongne, C. (2015). Past, present and future: emerging media’s role in online learning. In 2015 TCC worldwide online conference. University of Hawaii.

Christopoulos, A., & Mystakidis, S. (2023). Gamification in education. Encyclopedia, 3(4), 1223–1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3040089

Cline, E. (2011). Ready player one. Random House.

Damer, B., & Hinrichs, R. (2014). The virtuality and reality of avatar cyberspace. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199826162.013.032CrossRef

De Corte, E. (2003). Transfer as the productive use of acquired knowledge, skills, and motivations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01250CrossRef

Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. UNESCO Pub.

Dengel, A. (2022). What is immersive learning? In 2022 8th international conference of the immersive learning research network (iLRN) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN55037.2022.9815941

Eiris, R., Wen, J., & Gheisari, M. (2022). IVisit-collaborate: Collaborative problem-solving in multiuser 360-degree panoramic site visits. Computers & Education, 177, 104365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104365CrossRef

Gaba, D. M. (2004). The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care, 13(suppl_1), i2–i10. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009878

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003CrossRef

Halabi, O. (2020). Immersive virtual reality to enforce teaching in engineering education. Multimed Tools Appl, 79(3), 2987–3004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08214-8CrossRef

Hensen, B. (2023). A systematic literature review of mixed reality learning approaches. In L. T. De Paolis, P. Arpaia, & M. Sacco (Eds.), Extended reality (pp. 15–34). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43404-4_2

Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments—a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5CrossRef

Kapp, K. M., & O’Driscoll, T. (2010). Learning in 3D: Adding a new dimension to enterprise learning and collaboration. Pfeiffer.

Kolmos, A., Bøgelund, P., Spliid, C. M. (2019). Learning and assessing problem‐based learning at Aalborg University. In The Wiley handbook of problem‐based learning, Wiley (pp. 437–458). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch19

Kop, R., Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). [Online]. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103

Kshetri, N., Rojas-Torres, D., & Grambo, M. (2022). The metaverse and higher education institutions. IT Prof, 24(6), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2022.3222711CrossRef

MacCallum, K. (2022). The integration of extended reality for student-developed games to support cross-curricular learning. Front Virtual Real, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.888689

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2CrossRef

Mennecke, B. E., Triplett, J. L., Hassall, L. M., Jordan-Conde, Z., & Heer, R. (2011). An examination of a theory of embodied social presence in virtual worlds. Decision Sciences, 42(2), 413–449.CrossRef

Metcalf, S. J., Reilly, J. M., Kamarainen, A. M., King, J., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2018). Supports for deeper learning of inquiry-based ecosystem science in virtual environments - Comparing virtual and physical concept mapping. Comput Human Behav, 87, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.018CrossRef

Morales, T. M., Bang, E., & Andre, T. (2013). A one-year case study: understanding the rich potential of project-based learning in a virtual reality class for high school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9431-7CrossRef

Mulders, M. (2022). Vocational training in virtual reality: a case study using the 4C/ID model. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(7), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6070049CrossRef

Mulders, M., Buchner, J., & Kerres, M. (2020). A framework for the use of immersive virtual reality in learning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(24), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i24.16615CrossRef

Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010031CrossRef

Mystakidis, S., & Lympouridis, V. (2023). Immersive learning. Encyclopedia, 3(2), 396–405. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3020026CrossRef

Mystakidis, S., Berki, E., & Valtanen, J.-P. (2021). Deep and meaningful e-learning with social virtual reality environments in higher education: a systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052412CrossRef

Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., & Pellas, N. (2022). A systematic mapping review of augmented reality applications to support STEM learning in higher education. Educ Inf Technol (dordr), 27(2), 1883–1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10682-1CrossRef

Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., Fragkaki, M., & Dimitropoulos, K. (2023). Online professional development on educational neuroscience in higher education based on design thinking. Information, 14(7), 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070382CrossRef

Nilsson, N. C., Nordahl, R., & Serafin, S. (2016). Immersion Revisited: A review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Human Technology, 12(2), 108–134. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201611174652CrossRef

Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008CrossRef

Petrigna, L., & Musumeci, G. (2022). The metaverse: a new challenge for the healthcare system: a scoping review. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol, 7(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7030063CrossRef

Rashdall, H. (1985). The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, no. τ. 1. in The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages. Clarendon Press

Rhoads, R. A. (2015). MOOCs, high technology, and higher learning. In MOOCs, High technology, and higher learning. Johns Hopkins University Press

Romele, A., Gallino, F., Emmenegger, C., & Gorgone, D. (2017). Panopticism is not enough: social media as technologies of voluntary servitude. Surveillance and Society, 15(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i2.6021CrossRef

Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: a review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19–48. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.17.4.188CrossRef

Salen, K. (2017). Designing a place called school: a case study of the public school quest to learn. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHEJI.2017.08.002CrossRef

Scopes, L. (2009). Learning archetypes as tools of Cybergogy for a 3D educational landscape: a structure for e-teaching in second life. University of Southampton

Shea, P., et al. (2011). The Community of Inquiry framework meets the SOLO taxonomy: A process-product model of online learning. EMI Educ Media Int, 48(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2011.576514CrossRef

Shi, A., Wang, Y., & Ding, N. (2022). The effect of game–based immersive virtual reality learning environment on learning outcomes: Designing an intrinsic integrated educational game for pre–class learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1681467CrossRef

Smith, M., & Berge, Z. L. (2022). Social learning theory in second life. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2009. Accessed 14 Sep 2022. [Online]. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol5no2/berge_0609.pdf

Spector, J. M. (2014). Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0002-7CrossRef

Subramanian, S. (2021). As Covid-19 destroyed real economies, Second Life’s economy boomed. Yahoo! Finance. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/covid-19-destroyed-real-economies-110029836.html (accessed 18 Sep 2023).

Tlili, A., et al. (2022). Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: A combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00205-xCrossRef

Turan, Z., & Karabey, S. C. (2023). The use of immersive technologies in distance education: A systematic review. Educ Inf Technol (dordr). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11849-8CrossRef

Viano, A. (2023). What is a metaversity, and should you create one on your campus?, EdTech: Focus on Higher Education. https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/what-is-a-metaversity-perfcon (Accessed 29 Jan 2023).

Wang, Z., Anderson, T., Chen, L. (2018). How learners participate in connectivist learning: an analysis of the interaction traces from a cMOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3269

Won, M., et al. (2022). Diverse approaches to learning with immersion virtual reality identified from a systematic review. Comput Educ, 104701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104701

Wu, J., Guo, R., Wang, Z., & Zeng, R. (2021). Integrating spherical video-based virtual reality into elementary school students’ scientific inquiry instruction: Effects on their problem-solving performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1587469CrossRef

Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The proteus effect: implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communic Res, 36(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330254CrossRef

Titel: Immersive Learning Design in the Metaverse: A Theoretical Literature Review Synthesis
verfasst von: Stylianos Mystakidis
Vangelis Lympouridis
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: Application of the Metaverse in Education
Print ISBN: 978-981-9712-97-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-9712-98-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1298-4_4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner