nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Incentives for Digital Content Contribution

verfasst von : Xuejing Ma

Erschienen in: Social Influence on Digital Content Contribution and Consumption

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the topic of incentives for digital content contribution, exploring the effects of both monetary and non-monetary motivators on individuals’ content contribution behavior. The focus is on four specific types of digital content: reviews, crowdsourcing, creative production, and social media. By examining these content types, the chapter summarizes the motivators that can effectively incentivize their generation. The literature review reveals that while monetary incentives can be effective for some digital content, non-monetary incentives such as social recognition and intrinsic motivation may be more impactful for others. It emphasizes the need to align the type of incentive with the unique characteristics of the content and the creators’ motivations and preferences. This chapter sets the stage for the empirical analyses presented in the subsequent part of the book, which explore the social incentives and dynamics of digital content contribution, including the interplay between monetary incentives, social interaction, and content creation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction to Digital Content

Nächstes Kapitel Motives for Digital Content Consumption

https://www.luisazhou.com/blog/online-review-statistics/.

The FTC guideline states: “If there’s a connection between an endorser and the marketer of the product that consumers would not expect and it would affect how consumers evaluate the endorsement, that connection should be disclosed”.

Alam, S. L., & Campbell, J. (2017). Temporal motivations of volunteers to participate in cultural crowdsourcing work. Information Systems Research, 28(4), 744–759. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0719CrossRef

Amaldoss, W., Du, J., & Shin, W. (2021). Media Platforms’ content provision strategies and sources of profits. Marketing Science, 40(3), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2020.1248CrossRef

Bhattacharyya, S., Banerjee, S., Bose, I., & Kankanhalli, A. (2020). Temporal effects of repeated recognition and lack of recognition on online community contributions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(2), 536–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2020.1759341CrossRef

Brabham, D. C. (2012). Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application to improve public engagement in transit planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(3), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.693940CrossRef

Brun, J.-P., & Dugas, N. (2008). An analysis of employee recognition: Perspectives on human resources practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(4), 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190801953723CrossRef

Bründl, S., & Hess, T. (2016). Why do users broadcast? Examining individual motives and social capital on social live streaming platforms. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.

Budhathoki, N. R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Motivation for open collaboration: Crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 548–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469364CrossRef

Burtch, G., Hong, Y., Bapna, R., & Griskevicius, V. (2018). Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Science, 64(5), 2065–2082. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2715CrossRef

Cabral, L., & Li, L. (Ivy). (2015). A dollar for your thoughts: feedback-conditional rebates on eBay. Management Science, 61(9), 2052–2063.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2074

Chen, W., Wei, X., & Zhu, K. X. (2018). Engaging voluntary contributions in online communities: A hidden markov model. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/14196

Chen, Y., Harper, F. M., Konstan, J., & Li, S. X. (2010a). Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1358–1398. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1358CrossRef

Chen, Y., Ho, T.-H., & Kim, Y.-M. (2010b). Knowledge market design: A field experiment at google answers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(4), 641–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2010.01468.xCrossRef

Chen, Y., & Yeckehzaare, I. (2020). Motivating experts to contribute to digital public goods: A personalized field experiment on wikipedia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3588132CrossRef

Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345CrossRef

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer US.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Dellarocas, C., Gao, G., & Narayan, R. (2010). Are Consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 127–158. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270204CrossRef

Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2002). Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review.

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation: Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322CrossRef

Garnefeld, I., Iseke, A., & Krebs, A. (2012). Explicit Incentives in online communities: Boon or Bane? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170101CrossRef

Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. (1996). A Signaling explanation for charity. American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019–1028.

Godes, D., & Silva, J. C. (2012). Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science, 31(3), 448–473. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0653CrossRef

Goes, P. B., Guo, C., & Lin, M. (2016). Do Incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange. Information Systems Research, 27(3), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0635CrossRef

Goes, P. B., Lin, M., & Au Yeung, C. (2014). “Popularity Effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0512CrossRef

He, L., Luo, J., Tang, Y., Wu, Z., & Zhang, H. (2023). Motivating user-generated content: unintended consequences of incentive thresholds. Management Information Systems Quarterly, Forthcoming.

Hsieh, G., Kraut, R. E., & Hudson, S. E. (2010). Why pay?: Exploring how financial incentives are used for question & answer. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 305–314.https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753373

Hsu, C.-L., & Lin, J.C.-C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.11.001CrossRef

Huang, N., Burtch, G., Gu, B., Hong, Y., Liang, C., Wang, K., Fu, D., & Yang, B. (2019). Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Science, 65(1), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2944CrossRef

Jain, S., & Qian, K. (2021). Compensating online content producers: A theoretical analysis. Management Science, 67(11), 7075–7090. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3862CrossRef

Jiang, Z. (Zoey), Huang, Y., & Beil, D. R. (2022). The role of feedback in dynamic crowdsourcing contests: A structural empirical analysis. Management Science, 68(7), 4858–4877.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4140

Jin, J., Li, Y., Zhong, X., & Zhai, L. (2015). Why users contribute knowledge to online communities: An empirical study of an online social Q&A community. Information & Management, 52(7), 840–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.07.005CrossRef

Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T., & Veit, D. (2011). More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing—a study on mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems.

Khern-am-nuai, W., Kannan, K., & Ghasemkhani, H. (2018). Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Information Systems Research, 29(4), 871–892. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0750CrossRef

Krishnamurthy, S. (2006). On the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of free/libre/open source (FLOSS) developers. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 18(4), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-006-1002-xCrossRef

Lacan, C., Le Nagard, E., & Desmet, P. (2022). Drivers of consumers’ Willingness to answer an eWOM solicitation for a time-limited offer. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 57(2), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221083096CrossRef

Lampel, J., & Bhalla, A. (2007). The Role of status seeking in online communities: Giving the gift of experience. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00332.xCrossRef

Li, L. (Ivy). (2010). Reputation, trust, and rebates: How online auction markets can improve their feedback mechanisms. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(2), 303–331.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00253.x

Li, L. (Ivy), & Xiao, E. (2014). Money talks: Rebate mechanisms in reputation system design. Management Science, 60(8), 2054–2072.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1848

Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0154CrossRef

Li, X., Liao, C., & Xie, Y. (2021a). Digital piracy, creative productivity, and customer care effort: evidence from the digital publishing industry. Marketing Science, 40(4), 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2020.1275CrossRef

Li, X., Shi, M., & Zhao, C. Y. (2021b). Incentivizing mass creativity: An empirical study of the online publishing market. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3842153CrossRef

Lin, F., & Huang, H. (2013). Why people share knowledge in virtual communities?: The use of Yahoo! Kimo Knowledge+ as an example. Internet Research, 23(2), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241311313295CrossRef

Liu, T. X., Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Chen, Y. (2014). Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Science, 60(8), 2020–2037. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1845CrossRef

Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.074CrossRef

Liu, Y., & Feng, J. (2021). Does money talk? The impact of monetary incentives on user-generated content contributions. Information Systems Research, 32(2), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0971CrossRef

Ma, M., & Agarwal, R. (2007). Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Information Systems Research, 18(1), 42–67. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0113CrossRef

Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R., & Dellarocas, C. (2010). The collective intelligence genome. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 38(3), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2010.5559142CrossRef

Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002CrossRef

McIntyre, S. H., McQuarrie, E. F., & Shanmugam, R. (2016). How online reviews create social network value: The role of feedback versus individual motivation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3–4), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095218CrossRef

Qiao, D., & Rui, H. (2023). Text Performance on the vine stage? The effect of incentive on product review text quality. Information Systems Research, 34(2), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1146CrossRef

Qiu, L., & Kumar, S. (2017). Understanding voluntary knowledge provision and content contribution through a social-media-based prediction market: a field experiment. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0679CrossRef

Rotman, D., Hammock, J., Preece, J. J., Boston, C. L., Hansen, D. L., Bowser, A., & He, Y. (2014). Does motivation in citizen science change with time and culture? Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556492

Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., & Jacobs, D. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145238

Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How Brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30CrossRef

Shriver, S. K., Nair, H. S., & Hofstetter, R. (2013). Social ties and user-generated content: Evidence from an online social network. Management Science, 59(6), 1425–1443. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1648CrossRef

Sun, M., & Zhu, F. (2013). Ad revenue and content commercialization: Evidence from blogs. Management Science, 59(10), 2314–2331. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1704CrossRef

Sun, Y., Dong, X., & McIntyre, S. (2017). Motivation of user-generated content: Social connectedness moderates the effects of monetary rewards. Marketing Science, 36(3), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.1022CrossRef

Tang, Q., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2012). Content contribution for revenue sharing and reputation in social media: A dynamic structural model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 41–76. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290203CrossRef

Teichmann, K., Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., Plank, A., & Strobl, A. (2015). Motivational drivers of content contribution to company-versus consumer-hosted online communities: company-hosted versus consumer-hosted online communities. Psychology & Marketing, 32(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20783CrossRef

Toubia, O., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to twitter? Marketing Science, 32(3), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0773

von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012a). Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly, 36, 649–676.CrossRef

Von Krogh, Haefliger, Spaeth, & Wallin. (2012b). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 649.https://doi.org/10.2307/41703471

Woolley, K., & Sharif, M. A. (2021). Incentives increase relative positivity of review content and enjoyment of review writing. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211010439CrossRef

Wu, F., & Huberman, B. A. (2008). How public opinion forms. In C. Papadimitriou & S. Zhang (Eds.), Internet and Network Economics (Vol. 5385, pp. 334–341). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92185-1_39

Zhang, K., Evgeniou, T., Padmanabhan, V., & Richard, E. (2012). Content contributor management and network effects in a UGC environment. Marketing Science, 31(3), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0639CrossRef

Zhang, X. (Michael), & Zhu, F. (2011). Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. American Economic Review, 101(4), 1601–1615.https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.4.1601

Titel: Incentives for Digital Content Contribution
verfasst von: Xuejing Ma
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: Social Influence on Digital Content Contribution and Consumption
Print ISBN: 978-981-9967-36-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-9967-37-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6737-7_2