nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Gestaltung von Arbeitsumgebungen

verfasst von : Cornelia Gerdenitsch, Christian Korunka

Erschienen in: Digitale Transformation der Arbeitswelt

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Die Frage nach der optimalen Gestaltung von Arbeitsumgebungen wird innerhalb unterschiedlicher Disziplinen erforscht. Neben der (Innen-)Architektur, die sich mit der Gestaltung von Räumen und Bürogebäuden befasst, versucht auch die Psychologie das Erleben und Verhalten in Arbeitsumgebungen zu verstehen, zu erklären und vorherzusagen. Der Begriff Arbeitsumgebung umfasst hierbei einerseits Arbeitsräume und Büroumgebungen, betrifft aber auch generell die aktuelle Umgebung, in der sich der/ die Arbeitende befindet. In dem Kapitel werden neue Ansätze in der Gestaltung von Arbeitsumgebungen berichtet und deren Effekte auf das arbeitende Individuum diskutiert. Dies geschieht getrennt für die Wissensarbeit sowie handwerkliche Industriearbeit.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Digitale Transformation der Wissens- und Industriearbeit

Nächstes Kapitel Empfehlungen für die Gestaltung von digitalen Arbeitswelten

Appel‐Meulenbroek, R., Groenen, P., & Janssen, I. (2011). An end‐user’s perspective on activity‐based office concepts. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630011111136830.CrossRef

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRef

De Been, I., & Beijer, M. (2014). The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12, 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2013-0011.CrossRef

Blok, M. M., Groenesteijn, L., Schelvis, R., & Vink, P. (2012). New Ways of Working: Does flexibility in time and location of work change work behavior and affect business outcomes? Work, 41, 2605–2610. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2012-1028-2605.CrossRefPubMed

Bodin Danielsson, C., & Bodin, L. (2008). Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environment & Behavior, 40, 636–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507307459.CrossRef

Bodin Danielsson, C., Chungkham, H. S., Wulff, C., & Westerlund, H. (2014). Office design’s impact on sick leave rates. Ergonomics, 57, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.871064.CrossRefPubMed

Brown, G. (2009). Claiming a corner at work: measuring employee territoriality in their workspaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.004.CrossRef

Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 577–594. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.17293710.CrossRef

Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90042-X.CrossRef

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Desor, J. A. (1972). Toward a psychological theory of crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032112.CrossRef

Elsbach, K. D. (2004). Interpreting workplace identities: the role of office décor. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 25, 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.233.CrossRef

Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 181–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/078559809.CrossRef

Gerdenitsch, C., Korunka, C., & Hertel, G. (2017). The effects of an activity-based flexible office redesign on office workers: A longitudinal study. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517697766.CrossRef

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative „description of personality“: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.CrossRefPubMed

Goodrich, R. (1986). The perceived office: The office environment as experienced by its users. In J. D. Wineman (Hrsg.), Behavioral issues in office design (S. 109–133). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Hertel, G., Rauschenbach, C., Thielgen, M. M., & Krumm, S. (2015). Are older workers more active copers? Longitudinal effects of age-contingent coping on strain at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 514–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1995.CrossRef

Hoendervanger, J. G., de Been, I., van Yperen, N. W., Mobach, M. P., & Albers, C. J. (2016). Flexibility in use: Switching behavior and satisfaction in activity-based work environments. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 18, 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2015-0033.CrossRef

Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199.CrossRef

Kraut, R. E., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Unterstanding effects of proximity on collaboration: implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Hrsg.), Distributed work (S. 137–162). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x.CrossRef

Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x.CrossRef

van Meel, J. (2011). The origins of new ways of working: office concepts in the 1970s. Facilities, 29, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111146297.CrossRef

Meijer, E. E., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & Sluiter, J. K. (2009). Effects of office innovation on office workers’ health and performance. Ergonomics, 52, 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130902842752.CrossRefPubMed

Millward, L. J., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Putting employees in their place: the impact of hot desking on organizational and team identification. Organization Science, 18, 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0265.CrossRef

Pongratz, H. J., & Voß, G. G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee’: towards a ‘self-entrepreneurial’ work force? Concepts and Transformation, 8, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.8.3.04pon.CrossRef

Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. (2001). Symbols as a language of organizational relationships. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 93–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23004-4.CrossRef

Robertson, B. J. (2016). Holacracy: Ein revolutionäres Management-System für eine volatile Welt. München: Vahlen.CrossRef

Ruostela, J., Lönnqvist, A., Palvalin, M., Vuolle, M., Patjas, M., & Raij, A.-L. (2015). „New Ways of Working“ as a tool for improving the performance of a knowledge-intensive company. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.57.CrossRef

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRef

Seddigh, A., Berntson, E., Bodin Danielsson, C., & Westerlund, H. (2014). Concentration requirements modify the effect of office type on indicators of health and performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.009.CrossRef

Thielgen, M. M., Krumm, S., & Hertel, G. (2014). When being old pays off: age mitigates adverse effects of low implicit-explicit motive congruency on work motivation. Journal of Career Assessment, 23, 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714547613.CrossRef

Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: how people are affected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5114.CrossRef

Wallach, E. J. (1983). Individuals and organizations: the cultural match. Trainings and Development Journal, 37, 28–36.

Wells, M. M. (2000). Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: the role of office personalization in employee and organizational well-being. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 20, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0166.CrossRef

Wohlers, C., & Hertel, G. (2016). Choosing where to work at work – towards a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1188220.CrossRefPubMed

Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269.CrossRefPubMed

Zajonc, R. B., Heingartner, A., & Herman, E. M. (1969). Social enhancement and impairment of performance in the cockroach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028063.CrossRef

Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (applications and Reviews), 23, 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144.CrossRef

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.CrossRefPubMed

Baruch-Feldman, C., Brondolo, E., Ben-Dayan, D., & Schwartz, J. (2002). Sources of social support and burnout, job satisfaction, and productivity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.7.1.84.CrossRefPubMed

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.CrossRef

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499.CrossRef

Deskmag (2016). Coworking Spaces and their members. Final results of the global coworking survey. Präsentation gehalten auf der GCUC Canada, Montréal. https://www.slideshare.net/carstenfoertsch/the-first-results-of-the-2017-global-coworking-survey, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.

deskmag (2017). The 2017 global coworking survey. http://www.deskmag.com/en/background-of-the-2017-global-coworking-survey

Eckenrode, J. (1983). The mobilization of social supports: some individual constraints. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896802.CrossRefPubMed

Foertsch, C. (2015). First results of the new global coworking survey. Deskmag. http://www.deskmag.com/en/first-results-of-the-new-global-coworking-survey-2015-16, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.

Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. (2014). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: the emergence of community in coworking spaces. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 14004–14004. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.139.CrossRef

Gerdenitsch, C., Scheel, T. E., Andorfer, J., & Korunka, C. (2016). Coworking spaces: a source of social support for independent professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gerdenitsch, C., Korunka, C., & Hertel, G. (2018). Need-supply fit in an activity-based flexible office: a longitudinal study during relocation. Environment & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517697766.CrossRef

Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012722.CrossRefPubMed

House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structure and process of social support. Annual Review Sociology, 14, 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001453.CrossRef

Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. (1980). Convoys over the life course: attachment, roles and social support. Life-span Development and Behavior, 3, 253–286.

Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place. New York: Marlowe & Company.

Osca, A., Urien, B., González-Camino, G., Martínez-Pérez, D. M., & Martínez-Pérez, N. (2005). Organisational support and group efficacy: a longitudinal study of main and buffer effects. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510589064.CrossRef

van Ostren, N. (2011). The art of hosting. Deskmag. http://www.deskmag.com/en/how-to-be-a-good-host-165, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.

Pohler, N. (2012). Neue Arbeitsräume für neue Arbeitsformen: Coworking spaces. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-012-0021-y.CrossRef

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698.CrossRefPubMed

Searle, B., Bright, J. E. H., & Bochner, S. (2001). Helping people to sort it out: The role of social support in the job strain model. Work & Stress, 15, 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370110086768.CrossRef

Shinn, M., Lehmann, S., & Wong, N. W. (1984). Social interaction and social support. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01107.x.CrossRef

Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070.CrossRef

Stephens, C., & Long, N. (2000). Communication with police supervisors and peers as a buffer of work-related traumatic stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 407–424.CrossRef

Taha, L. H., & Caldwell, B. S. (1993). Social isolation and integration in electronic environments. Behavior & Information Technology, 12, 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299308924391.CrossRef

Vega, G., & Brennan, L. (2000). Isolation and technology: the human disconnect. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810010377435.CrossRef

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352, 1573–1576. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf265.

Boyle, R. (2016). NASA uses Microsoft’s HoloLens and ProtoSpace to build its next Mars rover in augmented reality. GeekWire. http://www.geekwire.com/2016/nasa-uses-microsoft-hololens-build-mars-rover-augmented-reality, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018

Cavoukian, A. (2009). Privacy by design. The 7 foundational principles. https://iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2011/03/fred_carter.pdf, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.

Constantinescu, C., Popescu, D., Muresan, P.-C., & Stana, S.-I. (2016). Exoskeleton-centered process optimization in advanced factory environments. Procedia CIRP, 41, 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.051.CrossRef

Davinson, N., & Sillence, E. (2010). It won’t happen to me: promoting secure behaviour among internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1739–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.023.CrossRef

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.CrossRef

DIN EN ISO 10218-1:2012-01, Industrieroboter – Sicherheitsanforderungen – Teil 1: Roboter (ISO 10218-1:2011); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 10218-1:2011

DIN EN ISO 10218-2:2012-06, Industrieroboter – Sicherheitsanforderungen – Teil 2: Robotersysteme und Integration (ISO 10218-2:2011); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 10218-2:2011

DIN EN ISO 12100:2011-03, Sicherheit von Maschinen – Allgemeine Gestaltungsleitsätze – Risikobeurteilung und Risikominderung (ISO 12100:2010); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 12100:2010

DIN EN ISO 9241-110, Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion – Teil 110: Grundsätze der Dialoggestaltung (ISO 9241-110:2006); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 9241-110:2006

DIN EN ISO 9241-11:2016-01, Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion – Teil 11: Gebrauchstauglichkeit: Begriffe und Konzepte (ISO/DIS 9241-11:2015); Deutsche und Englische Fassung prEN ISO 9241-11:2015

Dünser, A., Grasset, R., Seichter, H., & Billinghurst, M. (2007). Applying HCI principles to AR systems design. HIT Lab NZ. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35460442.pdf, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.

Flemisch, F., Heesen, M., Hesse, T., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., & Beller, J. (2012). Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: Authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0191.

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322.CrossRef

Grau, O. (2003). Virtual art. From illusion to immersion. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347.CrossRefPubMed

Hacker, W., & Sachse, P. (2014). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie – Psychische Regulation von Tätigkeiten (3. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 59–170.CrossRef

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign (organization development). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Hansen, M., & Thiel, C. (2012). Cyber-physical Systems und Privatsphärenschutz. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, 1, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-012-0007-8.CrossRef

Koren, Y. (2010). The global manufacturing revolution: Product-process-business integration and reconfigurable systems. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9780470618813 https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470618813.CrossRef

Lackes, R. & Siepermann, M. (2014a). Datensicherheit. In Springer Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Datensicherheit. Abgerufen von http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/74976/datensicherheit-v8.html

Lackes, R. & Siepermann, M. (2014b). Software-Ergonomie. In Springer Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Software-Ergonomie. Abgerufen von http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/75685/software-ergonomie-v10.html

LaViola Jr., J. J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 32, 47–56. http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/~jjl/pubs/cybersick.pdf.CrossRef

Markis, A., & Ranz, F. (2016). Sicherheit in der Mensch-Roboter Kollaboration – Grundlagen, Herausforderungen, Ausblick. https://www.fraunhofer.at/content/dam/austria/documents/WhitePaperTUEV/White%20Paper_Sicherheit_MRK_Ausgabe%201.pdf, Zugegriffen am 21.10.2018.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080335.CrossRef

Michalos, G., Makris, S., Tsarouchi, P., Guasch, T., Kontovrakis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2015). Design considerations for safe human-robot collaborative workplaces. Procedia CIRP, 37, 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.014.CrossRef

Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.CrossRefPubMed

Nerdinger, F. W., Blickle, G., & Schaper, N. (2011). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2. Aufl.). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16972-4.CrossRef

Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

Onnasch, L., Maier, X., & Jürgensohn, T. (2016). Mensch-Roboter-Interaktion. Eine Taxonomie für alle Anwendungsfälle. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin. https://doi.org/10.21934/baua:fokus20160630.CrossRef

Riccio, G. E., & Stoffregen, T. A. (1991). An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological Psychology, 3, 195–240. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0303_2.CrossRef

Rifkin, J. (2016). Das Ende der Arbeit und ihre Zukunft. Neue Konzepte für das 21. Jahrhundert (4. Aufl.). Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.

Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRef

Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M. S., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction (6. Aufl.). Essex: Pearson. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/DTUI6

Siller, H. (2013). Phishing. In Springer Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Phishing. Abgerufen von http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/1408512/phishing-v4.html

Spath, D., Ganschar, O., Gerlach, S., Hämmerle, M., Krause, T., Schlund, S. (2013). Produktionsarbeit der Zukunft-Industrie 4.0. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag.

Stegmann, S., van Dick, R., Ullrich, J., & Wu, T.-C. T. (2010). Der Work Design Questionnaire: Vorstellung und erste Validierung einer deutschen Version. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 51, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1026/0942-4089/a000002.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision sciences, 27, 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.CrossRef

Voigt, K.-I. (2017). Losgröße. In Springer Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Losgröße. http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/57174/losgroesse-v6.html.

Titel: Gestaltung von Arbeitsumgebungen
verfasst von: Cornelia Gerdenitsch
Christian Korunka
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Digitale Transformation der Arbeitswelt
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55673-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-55674-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55674-0_3

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner